Adjudication
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Lisa Donohoe (Editor)
In Phoenix International Group Pty Ltd v Resources Combined No. 2 Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2009] VSC 459 (8 October 2009) The TEC List Judge (Vickery J) ultimately refused an Application for Judgment, based on an adjudication determination under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act (Vic) 2002 (pre-30 March 2007 amendments), where the respondent asserted that the determination was void on various grounds. His Honour concluded that there was an arguable case that the determination was void. His Honour also concluded that, consistent with previous instances where the court relied upon its inherent jurisdiction to dispose of an action by such means as may be proper, it was appropriate to apply, to Section 27 of the pre-amendment Act, the principles that would usually apply to applications for summary judgment.
Other Recent Entries
- Seabay Properties Pty Ltd v Galvin Properties Pty [2011] VSC 183
- Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190
- Asian Pacific Building Corporation Pty Ltd v Aircon Duct Fabrication Pty Ltd & Ors…
- Asian Pacific Building Corporation Pty Ltd v Aircon Duct Fabrication Pty Ltd & Ors…
- Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWSC 332
- Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction v H&M Engineering & Construction [2010] NSWS…
- View all Adjudication Updates

