Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
In Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No. 3) [2010] FCA 24 (4 February 2010), the Federal Court of Australia (in a lengthy judgment) considered the question of whether an internet service provider ("ISP") authorises the infringement of copyright of its users or subscribers when they download cinematograph films in a manner which infringes copyright. In Australian copyright law, a person who authorises the infringement of copyright is treated as if they themselves infringed copyright directly. In dismissing the application, the Court made a number of findings, including that the ISP did not authorise the infringement of copyright, nor have the obligation to stop infringements. Compliance with 'safe harbour provisions' in the Copyright Act 1968 may be evidence that can be relevant to show that a carriage service provider ("CSP") ought not be liable for copyright infringement. There is only one infringement even if the internet user transmits more than 100% of a file back to the swarm of computers in multiple packets of information; the correct approach is to view each group of computers as an entity itself.
Other Recent Entries
- Role of architect proprietors when administering a building contract
- Damages for defective work - relevance of plaintiff's future intention
- Court of Appeal considers meaning of “building work” and “building action”…
- High Court rules on whether loss of chance should be extended to medical negligenc…
- Consequential loss - What's in and what's out?
- What amounts to a deed and when is “a deal a deal”?
- View all Case Reports Updates

