Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Lisa Donohoe (Editor)
In Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty LTD [2010] NSWCA 190 (24 September 2010), the NSW Court of Appeal was considering the validity of an adjudicator’s determination of an application which did not comply with section 17(2)(a), (claimant's duty to notify intention to apply for adjudication within 20 days after due date for payment). This requirement had not been identified by Hodgson J as a "basic and essential requirement" in Brodyn. The Court of Appeal concluded that the failure to comply with Section 17(2)(a) resulted in a jurisdictional error, and was therefore invalid. (This seemingly extends the range of matters that, following Brodyn, would be sufficient for a determination to be invalid.)
Other Recent Entries
- Altain Khuder LLC v IMC Mining Inc & IMC Mining Solutions Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 1
- Thomas v Powercor Australia Limited (Ruling No 1) [2010] VSC 489 (29 October 2010)…
- Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190
- Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2010] NSWCA 59 (19 Ap…
- Roads Corporation v Love [2010] VSC 253 (Vickery J)
- Anderson Formrite Pty Ltd v Baulderstone Pty Ltd (No 7) [2010] FCA 921
- View all Case Reports Updates

