Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
Posted: 29 July 2009
The Supreme Court of New South Wales recently determined whether a certification by a third party, such as an architect or engineer, constituted "conclusive evidence" that remedial works had been performed in accordance with the contractual terms: ACN 002 804 702 (formerly Brooks Building) v McDonald [2009] NSWSC 610 (3 July 2009)
Other Recent Entries
- Role of architect proprietors when administering a building contract
- Damages for defective work - relevance of plaintiff's future intention
- Court of Appeal considers meaning of “building work” and “building action”…
- High Court rules on whether loss of chance should be extended to medical negligenc…
- Consequential loss - What's in and what's out?
- What amounts to a deed and when is “a deal a deal”?
- View all Case Reports Updates