Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
In United Group Rail Services Limited v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2009] NSWCA 177 (3 July 2009), the New South Wales Court of Appeal confronted the meaning of, and the circumstances in which, clauses requiring parties to negotiate in good faith will be enforceable. Justice Allsop's interpretation of the phrase "genuine and good faith" is particularly noteworthy and is likely to have broader application in the interpretation of dispute resolution clauses in commercial contracts.
Other Recent Entries
- Role of architect proprietors when administering a building contract
- Damages for defective work - relevance of plaintiff's future intention
- Court of Appeal considers meaning of “building work” and “building action”…
- High Court rules on whether loss of chance should be extended to medical negligenc…
- Consequential loss - What's in and what's out?
- What amounts to a deed and when is “a deal a deal”?
- View all Case Reports Updates

