Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Lisa Donohoe (Editor)
Posted: 21 September 2009
In Baxbex Pty Ltd v Bickle [2009] QSC 194 (28 July 2009), the Supreme Court of Queensland highlighted the technical requirements (in this case, the need to identify the construction work or related goods and services claimed) that must be satisfied in order to successfully serve a payment claim under the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (Qld). Held: claim not for construction work or related goods or services under Act as work consisted of administration and supervisory costs.
Other Recent Entries
- Altain Khuder LLC v IMC Mining Inc & IMC Mining Solutions Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 1
- Thomas v Powercor Australia Limited (Ruling No 1) [2010] VSC 489 (29 October 2010)…
- Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190
- Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2010] NSWCA 59 (19 Ap…
- Roads Corporation v Love [2010] VSC 253 (Vickery J)
- Anderson Formrite Pty Ltd v Baulderstone Pty Ltd (No 7) [2010] FCA 921
- View all Case Reports Updates