Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
In Yarraman Pine P/L v Forestry Plantations Queensland [2009] QCA 102 (24 April 2009), the Queensland Court of Appeal has considered whether an arbitrator is permitted to remake a determination which is made pursuant to a contract. Held: arbitrator could only remit matter to chief executive in accordance with contract and not make fresh determination. Arbitrator did not have right to undertake full merits review as dispute of broad discretional character and arbitrator did not have requisite knowledge or expertise.
The significance of this decision is that where a contract provides for a fixed "mechanical" process which is sufficiently certain, the arbitrator has the power to make the award. However, where the determination is made pursuant to a "broad exercise of discretion" or requires specialised knowledge, the arbitrator cannot set aside the determination unless it was made contrary to contractual obligations to act honestly, fairly and reasonably.
Other Recent Entries
- Role of architect proprietors when administering a building contract
- Damages for defective work - relevance of plaintiff's future intention
- Court of Appeal considers meaning of “building work” and “building action”…
- High Court rules on whether loss of chance should be extended to medical negligenc…
- Consequential loss - What's in and what's out?
- What amounts to a deed and when is “a deal a deal”?
- View all Case Reports Updates

