Case Reports
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
Posted: 15 February 2010
In Al-Atabi v Zaidi [2009] NSWCA 433 (23 December 2009), the New South Wales Court of Appeal determined whether a claim for variations formed part of work covered by a lump sum contract. Held: contract was lump sum contract (not cost plus agreement as submitted by Appellant). Requirements for variations under contract not satisfied. No waiver of requirements for variations.
Other Recent Entries
- Role of architect proprietors when administering a building contract
- Damages for defective work - relevance of plaintiff's future intention
- Court of Appeal considers meaning of “building work” and “building action”…
- High Court rules on whether loss of chance should be extended to medical negligenc…
- Consequential loss - What's in and what's out?
- What amounts to a deed and when is “a deal a deal”?
- View all Case Reports Updates