News Articles
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Lisa Donohoe (Editor)
This judgment was concerned with the question of the assessment of damages in two related proceedings. The dispute centred on representations made regarding the suitability of a polyethylene lining material for concrete tanks. Judgment for Steuler was awarded in both proceedings. Steuler argued that WMC could not prove any loss because they had submitted that it was “impossible to predict” what it would have done had it not entered into the transaction. They argued that because WMC could not demonstrate a comparison between the situation brought about by the contravening conduct and the situation as it would have been without such conduct; therefore they could not prove that it had suffered any detriment as a result of misleading conduct.
Other Recent Entries
- Proportionate Liability Reforms
- The Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2010 (Cth) was passed on 24 March 2011 by the Com…
- The Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), which came into operation on 1 January 2011, h…
- The Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) came into operation on 1 January 2011
- The Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW) came into effect on 1 October 2010. On 7…
- Government releases public discussion paper for National Building Energy Framework…
- View all News Articles Updates

