Sports Law
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
In Devyatovskiy & Tsikhan v IOC, the Court of Arbitration for Sport concluded that adverse analytical findings in relation to 2 hammer throwers who recorded high readings for testosterone (suggesting the presence of exogenous testorone) at the 2008 Beijing Olympics should be annulled due to non-compliances with the ISL standard by the laboratory.
In that case, the Panel was persuaded by the following non-compliances:
- non-reproducibility of the results betw… Find out more
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has concluded that Alexandro Valverde is guilty of an anti-doping violation, finding, on the evidence, that a bag of blood, contaminated with EPO, belonged to Mr Valverde.
Other Recent Entries
- WADA v Hardy and USADA (no significant fault)
- AFL player samples to be frozen in battle against doping
- CAS Applies the “Comfortable Satisfaction” Test to Uphold Olympic Speedskater …
- Paul J. Hayes, 'Burnt at the Stake : Unfairness and the ‘Ugly Parent'' (2005) 60…
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Amendment Bill 2009
- Volandri v ITF
- View all 32 Sports Law Updates