Sports Law
All contributions regarding the following information are gratefully accepted and should be directed to Angela Vaccari (Editor)
Posted: 02 June 2009
An independent, three-member American Arbitration Association (AAA)/Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) panel determined that Jessica Hardy had exercised sufficient "diligence" in her investigation of the supplements to be entitled, pursuant to the “no significant fault” qualification under the WADA Code, to a reduction in her suspension. Hardy's ban ends on 31 July 2009 allowing her to return to competition in August 2009.
Other Recent Entries
- WADA v Hardy and USADA (no significant fault)
- AFL player samples to be frozen in battle against doping
- CAS Applies the “Comfortable Satisfaction” Test to Uphold Olympic Speedskater …
- Paul J. Hayes, 'Burnt at the Stake : Unfairness and the ‘Ugly Parent'' (2005) 60…
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Amendment Bill 2009
- Volandri v ITF
- View all Sports Law Updates